Whether you should sell your Sioux Falls home or rent it out comes down to three things: your numbers, your timeline, and your tolerance for being a landlord. For most owners who are moving on and don’t need the equity right away, renting can work — but only if the monthly math and the tax clock both line up in your favor.
Quick Answer: Sell if you want to capture today’s equity, avoid landlord risk, or need the proceeds for your next home. Rent it out if market rent comfortably covers your mortgage and expenses, you want long-term income, and you can wait out the market. In Sioux Falls, watch one deadline above all: rent the home longer than three years and you may lose the IRS home-sale tax exclusion worth up to $250,000 or $500,000.
By Tyce Ortman · September 2, 2026
This is one of the most common questions Sioux Falls sellers are working through right now — especially owners who bought or refinanced at a low rate and don’t love the idea of giving it up. Renting the place out sounds like the best of both worlds. Sometimes it is. Often the numbers say otherwise. Here’s how to decide.
Run the numbers before anything else
Renting only makes sense if the rent covers the true cost of holding the home — not just the mortgage payment. Start with what a Sioux Falls home actually rents for. As of the July 2026 data, a single-family home in Sioux Falls rents for around $1,668 a month, while the typical apartment sits closer to $1,170. Call it roughly $18,000 to $22,000 a year in gross rent for a mid-range house.
Then subtract the real costs of being a landlord:
- Your mortgage principal and interest — the biggest line. If you’d need to buy your next home at today’s 30-year rate near 6.66% (Freddie Mac, August 27, 2026), keeping a low-rate loan on the rental is exactly why some owners hold.
- Property taxes and insurance — and note that a non-owner-occupied home loses the owner-occupied classification, so your property tax bill goes up once it’s a rental.
- Maintenance and repairs — budget about 1% of the home’s value per year. On a $340,000 home that’s roughly $3,400 annually, and older homes run higher.
- Vacancy — even one empty month is about 8% of your yearly rent gone.
- Property management — if you don’t want the 10 p.m. furnace calls, a manager typically takes 8–10% of gross rent.
If rent clears all of that with a cushion left over, renting is worth a serious look. If you’d be feeding the property every month just to hold it, that’s a slow bleed — and the equity you’d free up by selling could go straight into your next down payment. It helps to know what you’d actually net from a sale before you compare the two paths.
The tax deadline most owners don’t see coming
This is the single most important factor, and it’s the one people miss. When you sell a home you’ve lived in, the IRS lets you exclude up to $250,000 of profit if you’re single, or $500,000 if you’re married filing jointly, under the Section 121 exclusion. To qualify, you must have owned and lived in the home for at least two of the five years before the sale (IRS Publication 523).
Here’s the trap. That’s a rolling five-year window. If you rent the home out for more than three years, you fall outside the two-of-five-years test and lose the exclusion entirely. On a home that’s appreciated significantly, that can mean owing capital gains tax on a gain that would otherwise have been completely tax-free.
There’s a second wrinkle: depreciation recapture. Once you rent the home, you claim depreciation each year, and when you eventually sell, the IRS taxes that depreciation back at up to 25% — even if the rest of your gain is covered by the exclusion. South Dakota charges no state capital gains tax, so your only gains exposure is federal, but that federal bill can still be real. If you want to keep the home-sale break, the practical rule is simple: sell within three years of moving out, or plan to hold the rental long enough that the income justifies giving the exclusion up. We break the sale side down further in our guide to capital gains tax when you sell a South Dakota home.
Why South Dakota is friendlier to landlords than most states
If you do decide to rent, South Dakota is one of the better places to be a landlord — mostly because of what it doesn’t tax. The state has no personal income tax, so your rental income isn’t taxed at the state level the way it would be in most of the country. You’ll still owe federal income tax on the net rental profit, but keeping the entire state-tax slice is a genuine advantage that pushes the rent-it-out math a little further into the black.
Sioux Falls also has the demand to support a rental. The metro keeps adding jobs and residents, vacancy has stayed tight, and rents have climbed steadily. That’s the backdrop that makes holding a home viable here in a way it might not be in a shrinking market. Just remember that landlord-friendly tax treatment doesn’t erase the carrying costs above — it only improves the after-tax return once the property is already cash-flow positive.
When selling is the smarter move
Renting isn’t the default answer, and for a lot of Sioux Falls owners selling is clearly better. Lean toward selling if:
- You need the equity for your next down payment, to pay off debt, or to avoid carrying two mortgages at once.
- The rent wouldn’t cover your full carrying cost, so you’d be subsidizing the property every month.
- You don’t want the responsibility, liability, or time commitment of managing a tenant.
- Your home has appreciated a lot and you want to lock in that tax-free gain while you still qualify for the Section 121 exclusion.
Timing works in a seller’s favor right now, too. The Sioux Falls market is still a seller’s market in 2026, with the median sales price at $340,450 and sellers netting about 97.7% of list price (Realtor Association of the Sioux Empire, July 2026). New listings were up 9.6% year over year, so more inventory is coming — which is a reason some owners choose to list now rather than wait. And selling here is relatively cheap on the fee side: South Dakota’s real estate transfer fee is just $0.50 per $500 of price, roughly $335 on a median home, paid by the seller.
A simple way to decide
Work through it in this order. First, get a real rent estimate for your specific home and subtract every carrying cost — if it doesn’t cash flow, that usually settles it. Second, check the tax clock: if you’d rent for more than three years, weigh the value of the home-sale exclusion you’d be giving up. Third, be honest about whether you actually want to be a landlord. The math can say rent while your life says sell, and that’s a valid answer.
Every home and every situation is different, and the only way to know for sure is to run your real numbers side by side — projected rent and expenses against your net proceeds from a sale. That’s exactly the comparison I walk owners through before they decide.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long can I rent out my house before I lose the home-sale tax exclusion?
You need to have lived in the home for at least two of the five years before you sell. In practice that means you can rent it out for up to three years after moving out and still qualify for the Section 121 exclusion. Rent longer than that and you generally lose it, though depreciation you claimed is taxed either way.
Does renting my home in Sioux Falls raise my property taxes?
Yes. The owner-occupied classification that lowers the school general-fund levy applies only to your primary residence. Once the home becomes a rental, it’s taxed at the non-owner-occupied rate, so budget for a higher annual property tax bill when you run your numbers.
Is rental income taxed in South Dakota?
Not at the state level — South Dakota has no personal income tax. You’ll still report and pay federal income tax on your net rental profit, but you keep the state-tax portion that landlords in most other states would owe.
Should I sell now or wait if I’m on the fence?
With Sioux Falls still favoring sellers and inventory rising, waiting isn’t guaranteed to get you more. If your main reason to hold is a low mortgage rate, keeping the home as a rental can make sense — but only if it cash flows. If it doesn’t, selling into today’s market is usually the stronger financial move.
The bottom line
Rent your Sioux Falls home if it cash flows, you want long-term income, and the tax clock works. Sell if you need the equity, the numbers don’t cover your costs, or you’d rather lock in a tax-free gain while you still qualify. If you’re weighing this for your own home, I’m happy to run both scenarios with you — real rent projections against your true net from a sale — so you can decide with actual numbers instead of a guess. Reach out anytime.
Sources
- IRS Publication 523 — Selling Your Home (Section 121 exclusion, two-of-five-year test, depreciation recapture)
- Realtor Association of the Sioux Empire market report, July 2026 (median price, list-price ratio, new listings)
- Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey (30-year rate, August 27, 2026)
- Zumper Sioux Falls rent research (single-family and apartment rents, July 2026)
- South Dakota Department of Revenue (no state personal income tax)
About Tyce Ortman
Tyce Ortman is a residential real estate agent with the Jeff Merrill Team at eXp Realty, serving Sioux Falls, South Dakota and surrounding communities including Brandon, Harrisburg, and Tea. He works with both buyers and sellers, guiding them from first search or listing all the way through closing. Have a question about your own home? Grab the free Sioux Falls Buyers Guide or reach out directly at 605-413-7903.

Leave a comment